This is the face of a liberal, ignorant, jerkwad maggot. The maggot's name is david lindorff. He recently wrote an article to gloat about his pathetic fantasy of hoping for mass killing by way of drowning for denying the called global warming hoax. It is his desire for all that oppose and disagree with his ignorance such as me and millions of other intelligent people to die away. Those that survive be quartered in slums of his control as punishment for not accepting the GW hoax.
I have had it with arrogant liberals as lindorff pretending to be compassionate, open minded and all of the descriptives they use for themselves when reality is that they are the most violent, bigoted, racist, sexist, ignorant, unpatriotic, Godless animals to exist on the planet. It is easy to find evidence of my accusations; so, please do not be so shocked. The true problem is that most of the media enablers look the other way when liberals are revealed to be the beastly beings they are. Any attempts to call some type of moral equivalence that conservatism is just as bad is pure bogus mutterings.
I refuse to even consider any possibility of man made global warming is because the methods to predict such events are not accurate. Meteorologists of today can not give an accurate prediction of weather weeks or months in advance, yet I am supposed to believe a slight degree in temperature increase is true and without question? I will admit and agree to the history of climatic weather changes of the past; but, with the current liberal thinking of man made global warming is a so call fact I will never ever agree to or accept.

Just read and be unimpressed of the level of arrogant and colossal stupidity...

So they want to shut off the power for one hour to save electricty? Why just only one hour? Since they are so concerned for energy savings then shut down for perhaps 2,3,4-8 hours at night... Maybe they should restrict lights to only during PM hours.

Over on AOL is an article reporting on what I think is a boffo bizarre theory in both science and environmental aspects. I suspect this new madness is greatly applauded by VHEMT and PETA. I think both groups are as vile as the taliban. It seems Scientific American is receptive to the zero Humans silliness. I suppose I should add Scientific American to the list of 'what to avoid'...

Further evidence to not bother with Scientific American. I see nothing rational about atheism. Their claim is that God does not exist. Well, it seems Satan is smarter than the atheist in that the devil does know God exists. Given the fact the atheist does not consider God to exist then I would suppose they do not believe Satan's existence either.

I came across this article of how once again the 9th 'Circus Court of san francisco' has ruled in favor of enviromental emotions and has blocked efforts for Shell Oil to drill in Alaska. In my view, environmentalists of this type oppose the technological advances and techniques of the oil companies. The e-mentalists have knee jerk reactions to assume that the companies only want to destroy the land and seas for profit.

One of the groups that oppose drilling in the Artic region is Audubon. At their link, they have said how it is important to protect the land, flora and fauna because of its biological diversity. (diversity regardless of context is one of the liberals sacred words) Audubon also suggests alternative methods to produce fuels which is so needed. One of the methods mentioned is 'biofuel'. I must admit I know nothing about biofuel for the simple reason it is a concept the liberals are heralding. In my view the liberal left is consistently wrong for nearly everything so I do not bother to study up on this specific topic of theirs. The reason why I linked Audubon to this post is about their suggestion to use biofuel. Since they are so concerned about the enviornment including the plant and animal life, I really wonder how they would react (if at all) to what is happening to the orang-utang.True Audubon is an American group; but, would they care that one of the suggested fuel alternative is causing such in a different location of the globe?